# Contact Script GHK-Cu: Editorial Queries on the GHK-Cu Digest

> Contact Script GHK-Cu with editorial questions or corrections about our GHK-Cu literature summaries. We are an editorial publisher — not a clinic, not a vendor, and we offer no medical advice.

For corrections, source suggestions, or editorial questions about how we read the literature. We do not provide medical advice.

## Write to the editors

Use the form below to reach the editors of Script GHK-Cu with a correction, a study we should add, or a question about how we summarized a GHK-Cu finding. We read everything and update the digest when a reader points us to a source we missed or misread.

What we can help with is editorial: citations, the wording of a summary, a paper you think belongs in the reference list. What we cannot do is offer medical, dosing, or treatment advice — we are an editorial publisher, not a clinic, and there is no clinician on the other end of this form.

## What to expect

We are a small editorial project, so replies are considered rather than instant. If you are writing about a specific claim, including the page and the citation number helps us check it against the source quickly [6]. Corrections that hold up against the literature are incorporated, and we are glad to be told when a newer study supersedes one we cited.

We do not collect orders, we do not sell anything, and we have no products to ship — those queries we simply cannot answer. For the underlying science, the [full GHK-Cu reference list](/references) is the fastest path to the primary sources.

---

A misted reading-room for the GHK-Cu copper-tripeptide literature — each collagen, hair and wound-repair study held up to the light and cited at its source, the human-data gaps left translucent, with no clinic behind the glass and nothing here to dispense.